[fpc-devel] strings: a proposeal
jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Sun Feb 4 12:38:19 CET 2007
On 04 Feb 2007, at 12:01, Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Sun, 4 Feb 2007, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
>>> - No unique check by assigning to character.
>> True. But maybe we should simply allow to overload  then.
> Not necessary, wrap it into an object and define a default property.
Then you can't take the address anymore of individual characters, as
Thorsten mentioned on irc last night. E.g. this will not have the
But in general I dislike allowing to overload everything but the
kitchen sink, otherwise we'll end up with C++ (which does allow you
to overload pretty much every operator/token, meaning that you always
have to read each and every header and carefully look at each type
before you have any idea at all about what a certain expression could
More information about the fpc-devel