[fpc-devel] FP 2.4 questions

[Fabio Dell'Aria]

Ok,but if time is the only problem then why do not simple add the
feature in the official and definitive 2.4 roadmap and try to add it
in the next 6/12/24 months?

Is also possible add it as undocumented feature (as generics in 2.2)
in the next 2.4 version and finish its implementation and testing in
the 2.6 version.

2007/12/26, Florian Klaempfl <florian at freepascal.org>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schrieb:
> > Why is not possible add the package support as is on Delphi (using
> > Rtl.bpl, Vcl.bpl ...)?
>
> Time?
>
> >
> > Only if my project is compiled with packajes I must use all base
> > packages, otherwise I can continue to compile my project as today just
> > do Freepascal.
> >
> > 2007/12/26, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <pascalive at bol.com.br>:
> >> Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >>>> Did i miss something, technically? Is necessary to compile with rtl
> >>>> packages to distribute custom packages?
> >>> Yes. Well, unless you want the RTL statically linked into each
> >>> package, which will not work in a compatible way due the one
> >>> heap/multiple heaps issues.
> >>>
> >>> There is a solution though: Distribute the rtl in source code form and
> >>> compile it on installation. This could also be an advantage for
> >>> setting up cross compilation environments. But don't get excited yet:
> >>> We may or may not move to such a system in the future.
> >>>
> >> Thanks for the info. With this picture, i'm in favor of staying like is
> >> today. No packages.
> >>
> >> Luiz
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
> >> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
> >>
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
>


-- 
Best regards...

Fabio Dell'Aria.