[fpc-devel] Suggestion for change: Overly strict check

[Micha Nelissen]

Chris Cheney wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure he means that no can no longer, for example, copy a function 
>> from one class to another, without risking having to rewrite all the 
>> parameter names.
> 
> You have understood me correctly - I would have expressed it a little 
> differently, but not as succinctly.

Ok, so enforcing different names is good then, that makes code more
context insensitive, since identifiers won't suddenly "resolve" to
parameters with the same name.

Micha