[fpc-devel] Suggestion for change: Overly strict check

[Martin Schreiber]

On Thursday 28 September 2006 10.54, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
> The restriction could be subject to a configurable option (perhaps it is
> already) but, without a configurable option, the restriction should be
> omitted. If the language is changed to suit the whims of the developers,
> it might end up as a fine language, but one with no customers.
>

Agreed.
For me FPC should be a practical tool to build applications in a most 
productive way.
Something like 'friend units' where protected class members are accessible 
would be useful to avoid the use of 'cracker classes'.

Martin