[fpc-devel] Language extension: absolute for classes

[Marco van de Voort]

> On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> 
> > > On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Dani?l Mantione wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > For clarity:
> > > I am not opposing it, but I do consider it a dirty trick in both cases...
> > 
> > Hmm, I don't think neli's one is that dirty, more exotic syntactic sugar.
> > Yes it happens with the composition pattern, but is it really worth
> > inventing new syntax for?
> 
> What new syntax are you referring to ? You mean the 'absolute' ? 
> I don't think so...

Depends on implementation. Do you really implement absolute as with same
memoryspace here too, or only allow type upgrading (which is the major
reason for such feature)?