[fpc-devel] syncobjs unit
jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Mon Nov 27 15:32:40 CET 2006
On 27 nov 2006, at 15:18, Aleš Katona wrote:
>> I also think this is the right way. If you specify OS specific
>> return codes
>> per threadmanager, this will lead to unnecssary breakage.
> Return codes are one thing, argument another. What are we going to do
> about those? Eg: see "ExitCode" argument. It's a "dword" but int is
> expected as well.
> These can't be internaly abstracted like error codes.
I'd use a pointer, ptrint or ptruint in those cases. They naturally
grow with the cpu bitsize.
More information about the fpc-devel