[fpc-devel] Type definition
peter at freepascal.org
Sat Mar 4 21:28:39 CET 2006
> If there compelling reason why type definitions cannot be included in
> class/object definitions?
> Make it mode FPC to keep folks happy :)
> Quite often a type is defined in INTERFACE part, but only used within
> class/object defined in same unit.
> 1) This means that type is public. This is not always good thing in
> 2) Unit must be specified in child's child's USE list.
It breaks code and is therefor incompatible. A type symbol is never
searched in an object, class or record symtable.
More information about the fpc-devel