[fpc-devel] Type definition
almindor at gmail.com
Sat Mar 4 17:27:07 CET 2006
Paul Davidson wrote:
> If there compelling reason why type definitions cannot be included in
> class/object definitions?
> Make it mode FPC to keep folks happy :)
> Quite often a type is defined in INTERFACE part, but only used within
> class/object defined in same unit.
> 1) This means that type is public. This is not always good thing in
> 2) Unit must be specified in child's child's USE list.
> P Davidson
> Corax Networks Inc.
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
> disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not
> the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are notified
> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify Corax Networks immediately by email at
> webmaster at coraxnetworks.com. Thank you.
> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
I second this request. Throw in const fields too..
More information about the fpc-devel