[fpc-devel] Warning for sqldb and fpc 2.1.1 users
Joost van der Sluis
joost at cnoc.nl
Sat Apr 1 18:54:25 CEST 2006
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 18:32 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > In revision 3111 TBufDataset is almost completely rewritten. I've tested
> > as much as I could, but it could be that you encounter problems with
> > sqldb which weren't there before.
> > Please test if everything still works ok, and if not, tell me or submit
> > a bug-report.
> > Further I have a question: now sqldb uses a linked-list record buffer,
> Why ? This goes against the recordset idea ?
Why is that against the recordset idea?
> > the RecordCount and RecNo properties are something strange.
> > What should I do with recordcount? I can add a counter which keep track
> > of the recordcount. Ie: it does inc(recordcount) if a record is
> > appended.
> > Or I can do a real count of the records, each time recordcount is
> > called.
> > And what about recno? Just define it as -1, or do a quick count to get
> > the current record number?
> > What are your thoughts on this?
> The very idea of TBufDataset was that both recno and recordcount would
> always be available. So using a linked list is not so good.
> Why did you change that ?
Mostly because of speed-issues, and this makes the code far more easier.
With the array, if you're iterating through the data, you have to read
the pointer to the buffer in the array, and subsequently the data in the
With this new code, the record buffers contain pointers to their
precessor en successor. That makes searching and browsing a lot faster.
The TDataset only asks the 'next' and 'previous' records from the
TBufDataset. Or it uses bookmarks. Well, bookmarks in a linked list are
easy, they are just the pointers to the list-items.
And using mostly 'next' and 'previous', the linked list is the best
For TDataset it's a different story.
More information about the fpc-devel