[fpc-devel] Templates / Generics Syntax
Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaertnma at netcologne.de
Thu Nov 3 20:10:35 CET 2005
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 19:59:40 +0100 (CET)
Daniƫl Mantione <daniel.mantione at freepascal.org> wrote:
>
>
> Op Thu, 3 Nov 2005, schreef Mattias Gaertner:
>
> >
> > Here is a proposal of the syntax:
> >
> > type
> > TGenericClass<T,F> = class
> > public
> > procedure Add(Item: T; Flag: F);
> > end;
>
> This syntax is almost impossible to implement since in one of your other
> mails the symbols to mark the parameters appear in regular source code:
>
> begin
> generictypeA<integer>.create
> end.
>
> It will be very hard for the parser to see the difference in advance
> between:
>
> variable<integer(another_var)
> generic_type<integer
>
> Only when the > symbol is parsed the result is known.
>
> Maybe the parser may be able lookup the type first and make a decision
> based on that, but it would be in the middle of a recursive expression
> parse designed for infix operators.
>
> Also in C++ this sometimes causes trouble where you need to change your
> code notation so the compiler eats it. I don't know if this proposal
> suffers from this mess, but we should avoid at all cost to import it into
> Pascal.
Right. I didn't think of that.
What about edged brackets?
type
TGenericClass[T,F] = class
public
procedure Add(Item: T; Flag: F);
end;
procedure TGenericClass.Add(Item: T; Flag: F);
// Note: No redundant [T,F] after TGenericClass.
begin
end;
type TListOfComponent = TGenericList[TComponent];
Analog:
type TGenericListClass[T] = class of TGenericList[T];
type PGenericRecord[T] = ^TGenericRecord[T];
procedure GenericProc[T](Param: T);
begin
end;
Mattias
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list