[fpc-devel] Building for powerpc on FC4 seems to fail
Joost van der Sluis
joost at cnoc.nl
Tue Aug 16 17:26:47 CEST 2005
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 16:14 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 16 aug 2005, at 15:43, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > i'm trying to build fpc 2.0.0 on the Fedora buildsystem, but the build
> > fails for powerpc. The startcompiler gives a segfault.
>
> The reason is probably that the machine you are building on is a G5.
> For some reason, the Linux kernel people do not turn on a
> compatibility bit in the G5 which guarantees the same behaviour for
> the dcbz instruction as on other PPC's (it's meaning is "fill a cache
> line with zeroes", but cache lines on G5's are 128 bytes as opposed
> to 32 bytes on other ppc's and many programs, including the FPC rtl,
> count on that -- which is the reason why this compatibility bit
> exists and why the G5 also has a dcbzl instruction which zeroes out a
> full 128 bytes in all cases).
>
> Anyway, the result is that too much memory is zeroed out by some RTL
> routines. You can solve it by disabling all routines rtl/powerpc/
> *.inc which include the dcbz instruction and then rebuilding the
> compiler on a non-G5 machine.
Ok, it seems like that they don't compile on ppc at all. They use a
mainframe with a 'couple of POWER5 (gr), at 1655.992000MHz'
If I understood correctly they don't support Altivec (VMX?) and are
there some other issues.
Is it possible at all to make a power-port? Maybe the power also has the
cache-issue, and is that the main problem?
If someone is willing to look at it, but doesn't have a POWER5 machine,
he can try to get an account on the Linux on POWER-challende machines?
Any thoughts on this?
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Joost van der Sluis
CNOC Informatiesystemen en Netwerken
http://www.cnoc.nl
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list