[fpc-devel] inline and asm code
Jonas Maebe
jonas at zeus.ugent.be
Mon Aug 1 22:20:45 CEST 2005
On 01 Aug 2005, at 22:11, Gerhard Scholz wrote:
> I found out that for operators which are declared to be inline and
> have asm code
> inside the inlining option is ignored (I assume the same would be
> true for
> procs/funcs).
>
> Is that intentional? Does it have a reason?
Yes, inlining assembler is much harder than inlining Pascal code (and
even harder to do it efficiently).
Jonas
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list