[fpc-devel] inline and asm code

Jonas Maebe jonas at zeus.ugent.be
Mon Aug 1 22:20:45 CEST 2005

On 01 Aug 2005, at 22:11, Gerhard Scholz wrote:

> I found out that for operators which are declared to be inline and  
> have asm code
> inside the inlining option is ignored (I assume the same would be  
> true for
> procs/funcs).
> Is that intentional? Does it have a reason?

Yes, inlining assembler is much harder than inlining Pascal code (and  
even harder to do it efficiently).


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list