[fpc-devel]bugs to close

[Johannes Berg]

On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 12:00, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I'll investigate the signal handling issue(s) and see if its possible to
> handle SIGFPE properly.

This is already implemented, at least on linux. So why is there even a
check? If I do
writeln(ln(a)) where a:extended=0
then I get a SIGFPE which is handled and converted to a runtime error or
exception (depending on having sysutils or not).

johannes
-- 
http://www.sipsolutions.de/
GnuPG key: http://www.sipsolutions.de/keys/JohannesBerg.asc
  Key-ID: 9AB78CA5 Johannes Berg <johannes at sipsolutions.de>
  Fingerprint = AD02 0176 4E29 C137 1DF6 08D2 FC44 CF86 9AB7 8CA5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freepascal.org/pipermail/fpc-devel/attachments/20031125/a52ab0d6/attachment.sig>