[fpc-pascal] Re: SDFDataset users!?
michael.vancanneyt at wisa.be
michael.vancanneyt at wisa.be
Tue Sep 25 11:02:21 CEST 2012
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
> On 25-9-2012 10:16, michael.vancanneyt-0Is9KJ9Sb0A at public.gmane.org wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
>>> I'd suggest:
>>> 1. adding a readme as indicated in my other mail so that users and
>>> developers do not fall into the same trap
>>
>> Hoho, there is no trap :-)
> Well, not intentional, but it sure is confusing.
I can relate to that, being confused myself :-)
>>> 2. documenting similar unwritten assumptions in other relevant units as
>>> well. Not doing so is a great way to discourage contributors
>>
>> That is definitely not the intention. See my other mail.
>>
>> I was frankly surprised by the strong responses I got.
>>
>> Any assumptions I made were mine, and definitely not the law, I just
>> gave them as 'historical background', because that is how I perceived
>> the original question :-)
> Ok, that explains some of the disconnect then.
> I've responded to your other mail ;)
>
> Friends? ;)
I have never thought otherwise :-)
Michael.
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list