[fpc-devel] 134 open merge requests - is that normal?

Michael Van Canneyt michael at freepascal.org
Tue Apr 7 10:59:22 CEST 2026



On Tue, 7 Apr 2026, Marco van de Voort via fpc-devel wrote:

>
> Op 6-4-2026 om 23:43 schreef Graeme Geldenhuys via fpc-devel:
>>> 
>>> It also leads to a more buggy compiler though. FPC has great
>>> stability and i think not making a release until the compiler
>>> is stable enough is a good thing for end users.
>> 
>> Respectfully, I disagree that time-based releases inherently lead to more 
>> bugs. In fact, the current 5-year gap since the 3.2.2 release is causing a 
>> different kind of "instability" for framework developers and end-users.
>
> Respectfully, I disagree. Time-based releases don't solve anything in the 
> current FPC context.
>
> It works for a few large and heavily sponsored projects with heaps of grunts 
> that continuously do release engineering work anyway for their corporate 
> masters' internal trees. Then you only have to pick a moment, and that might 
> as well be on a clock, or by lobbing an arrow at a dart board.

Timed releases make perfect sense in any context:

Whatever is in, is in. What is not, goes in the next release.

It's like a train schedule:

If a fix catches the current train, great. Else it takes the next train.

in the end all fixes reach the destination:
The users get their desired updates on a regular basis. 
Maybe not in this, but then in the next release.

Michael.


More information about the fpc-devel mailing list