[fpc-devel] 134 open merge requests - is that normal?
Michael Van Canneyt
michael at freepascal.org
Tue Apr 7 10:59:22 CEST 2026
On Tue, 7 Apr 2026, Marco van de Voort via fpc-devel wrote:
>
> Op 6-4-2026 om 23:43 schreef Graeme Geldenhuys via fpc-devel:
>>>
>>> It also leads to a more buggy compiler though. FPC has great
>>> stability and i think not making a release until the compiler
>>> is stable enough is a good thing for end users.
>>
>> Respectfully, I disagree that time-based releases inherently lead to more
>> bugs. In fact, the current 5-year gap since the 3.2.2 release is causing a
>> different kind of "instability" for framework developers and end-users.
>
> Respectfully, I disagree. Time-based releases don't solve anything in the
> current FPC context.
>
> It works for a few large and heavily sponsored projects with heaps of grunts
> that continuously do release engineering work anyway for their corporate
> masters' internal trees. Then you only have to pick a moment, and that might
> as well be on a clock, or by lobbing an arrow at a dart board.
Timed releases make perfect sense in any context:
Whatever is in, is in. What is not, goes in the next release.
It's like a train schedule:
If a fix catches the current train, great. Else it takes the next train.
in the end all fixes reach the destination:
The users get their desired updates on a regular basis.
Maybe not in this, but then in the next release.
Michael.
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list