[fpc-devel] "Default" discussion for SmartPointers etc

[Michael Van Canneyt]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Jonas Maebe wrote:

>
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote on Wed, 27 Jul 2016:
>
>> Why not introduce an address operator ?
>> 
>> operator @ (T : MyType) : Pointer;
>
> It's only needed because Maciej wants the proxy type to behave differently 
> from all other existing types. The solution is not to add functionality to 
> make that easier, but to fix the inconsistencies.

Then I didn't understand what exactly you think is inconsistent ?

Knowing the purpose, what do you think can be done ?

Michael.