[fpc-devel] Suggestion: reference counted objects
Hans-Peter Diettrich
DrDiettrich1 at aol.com
Tue Sep 23 01:45:16 CEST 2014
Sven Barth schrieb:
> Am 22.09.2014 12:59 schrieb "Hans-Peter Diettrich" <DrDiettrich1 at aol.com
> > That's why I also suggested an compiler option, useful for all people
> which care about program size or ARC at all.
>
> The problem with the compiler option is that you'd need to rebuild the
> complete RTL, packages and your application so that every unit has these
> changes. Otherwise e.g. the RTL would still contain reference counting
> code and TObject would still contain a reference count field.
Right, it should be a compiler *build* option, so that everybody can
create his favored flavor(s) of the compiler, and decide which one to
use with which project.
Every compiler then should provide a predefined constant for every such
option, in case specific handling is required by conditional compilation
of user code.
> > Is it me, or what else makes you so angry today?
> > Sorry for that :-(
>
> I'm sorry that I got aggressive, but it's quite frustrating when one
> writes a simple example to illustrate something and the first complain
> is how to make it use a better design which is completely besides the
> point of the example -.-
Then I missed the point of the example(s). It looked to me like
something final, well thought like the rest of your message.
DoDi
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list