[fpc-devel] for-in-index loop

Marco van de Voort marcov at stack.nl
Mon Jan 28 14:24:15 CET 2013


In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> > I use avanced record syntax because it makes code more understandable.
> 
> It offers nothing that objects didn't already have.
> 
> Just trying to say that this is one of these things where Delphi could simply 
> have re-instated the TP-style objects. The compiler compiled them anyway already.
> There was no need to burden records with methods in an attempt to make them 'object-like'.

I think it works the other way around, creating room to deprecate TP objects
in time. 



More information about the fpc-devel mailing list