[fpc-devel] for-in-index loop
Marco van de Voort
marcov at stack.nl
Mon Jan 28 14:24:15 CET 2013
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
> > I use avanced record syntax because it makes code more understandable.
>
> It offers nothing that objects didn't already have.
>
> Just trying to say that this is one of these things where Delphi could simply
> have re-instated the TP-style objects. The compiler compiled them anyway already.
> There was no need to burden records with methods in an attempt to make them 'object-like'.
I think it works the other way around, creating room to deprecate TP objects
in time.
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list