[fpc-devel] Unicode resource strings

[Aleksa Todorovic]

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Ivanko B <ivankob4mse2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Handling 1..4(6) bytes is less efficient than handling surrogate
>  *pairs*.
> ===============
> But surrogate pairs break array-like fast char access anyway,  isn't it ?

It's also "broken" in UTF8 in the same way - so none of them gets +1
on this. UCS4 is the only real winner here (one dword for each
character).






>
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel