[fpc-devel] bounty: FPC based debugger
Joost van der Sluis
joost at cnoc.nl
Tue Sep 13 14:53:48 CEST 2011
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 14:48 +0200, Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 01:22 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> >
> > Don't insult people when you clearly don't have any experience
> > whatsoever in working with them.
> Sorry if I sounded impolite. I did not at all mean to insult them. On
> the contrary I praise them for their exceptional work !
>
> I only wanted to state that it does not make much sense to try to have
> specific additional features included in gdb to improve it's usability
> with FPC.
Why not? There are many already. If you want to do a full gdb-build, fpc
is even a buildrequirement. ;) (This is for the gdb-testsuitem which has
some fpc-tests)
> > The gdb people have always been extremely helpful to Pierre, Joost and
> > me whenever we had any questions whatsoever about how to add certain
> > Pascal-specific functionality to gdb. And the gcc people have added a
> > DWARF identifier for the i386 Borland calling convention in a header
> > file that's imported by gdb so that it would be possible to add
> > support for it to gdb (even though gcc does not support it in any way).
> If we could really hope for this, I would vote for a gdb extension
> instead of creating a completely new debugger from scratch .
You do know that GDB does have a Pascal extension, right?
Joost
--
My Lazarus blog: http://www.lazarussupport.com/lazarus/weblog
More information about the fpc-devel
mailing list