[fpc-devel] language extensions

[Michael Schnell]

> We already have the generics can the preprocessor symbols. That leaves the 
> "for in". The development team has its doubts about the "for in" 
> construct, but:
>
> * Andreas did it in a reasonably clean way with a lot less hacks and 
>   ugly constructions than Delphi did.
> * The pressure on us is increasing to have a "for in".
>   
AFAIK, Chrome does extended "for in" or similar stuff.

Case-string seems very handy in many cases and does not look like 
imposing problems.

-Michael