[fpc-devel] Diff for GTK 2.6

[Florian Klaempfl]

richard jackson wrote:
> Just as a side note. I'm working on updating the gtk unit to support all
> of the new stuff in 2.8.x. Right now I'm about a third of the way
> through Glib.
> 
> I do have one question though. I noticed that the functions/procedures
> that use a variable number of arguments have multiple signatures in the
> current unit.
> One for Kylix compatibility and 2 for FPC.
> I've changed those to just one now that FPC accepts the varargs
> parameter to functions/procedures.
> Is that the correct way? Or should I stick with the ( args: array of
> const )  way of doing it for FPC.

Well, I think the "args: array of const" looks much more (object)
pascalish but if there is still interest in using the interfaces with
Kylix, I see no reason why we shouldn't use varargs if it makes
conversion easier. Especially, it's only an interface unit ...

> 
> Thanks
> Richard Jackson
> 
> On 9/2/05, *Federico Lox Lucignano* <federico_lox at yahoo.it
> <mailto:federico_lox at yahoo.it>> wrote:
> 
>     I made this little patch thinking that the default GTK_2_2 define
>     directive
>     in gtk2.pas is really obsolete looking at the current versions of the
>     library (2.8.x and 2.6.x).
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
>     <mailto:fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org>
>     http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
>     <http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel at lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel