<div dir="auto">They might with a change of ownership, who knows these days,  but the fact they did use it in the past would not look good for any litigation from some bottom feeder.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 3, 2017 4:36 PM, "Sven Barth" <<a href="mailto:pascaldragon@googlemail.com">pascaldragon@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p>Am 03.01.2017 19:02 schrieb "Dmitriy Pomerantsev" <<a href="mailto:pda2@yandex.ru" target="_blank">pda2@yandex.ru</a>>:<br>
><br>
> Doesn't matter since FPC license allowing that.</p>
<p>You don't get the point, do you? I don't think they'd use FPC themselves if they'd sue it the next time around.</p>
<p>Regards,<br>
Sven</p>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
fpc-pascal maillist  -  <a href="mailto:fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org">fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.<wbr>org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.freepascal.org/<wbr>cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-<wbr>pascal</a><br></blockquote></div></div>