<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/02/2016 12:00,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fpc-pascal-request@lists.freepascal.org">fpc-pascal-request@lists.freepascal.org</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:mailman.3.1455879601.6108.fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Message: 2
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:16:15 +0000
From: Lukasz Sokol <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:el.es.cr@gmail.com"><el.es.cr@gmail.com></a>
To: <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org">fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org</a>
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Happy tickets benchmark [OT]
Std deviation also matters:
</pre>
<pre wrap="">Std dev shows that runs of Prog2 have more error
so its measurements can't be trusted <i class="moz-txt-slash"><span class="moz-txt-tag">/</span>more<span class="moz-txt-tag">/</span></i> than Prog1.
The sample also is too small for meaningful statistics <span class="moz-smiley-s3" title=";)"><span>;)</span></span>
</pre>
</blockquote>
Exactly, the variance too. Many things matter.<br>
My example shows only that AVG estimation is better than MIN in the
simple technical test with 10 runs because of average the runtime
"noise".<br>
I suppose it could be approved more strictly.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Serguei<br>
</body>
</html>