<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Sven Barth <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pascaldragon@googlemail.com" target="_blank">pascaldragon@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>On 17.02.2015 19:20, silvioprog wrote:<br>
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sven Barth <<a href="mailto:pascaldragon@googlemail.com" target="_blank">pascaldragon@googlemail.com</a><br></span><span>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:pascaldragon@googlemail.com" target="_blank">pascaldragon@<u></u>googlemail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
On 17.02.2015 18:25, silvioprog wrote:<br>
<br>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Sven Barth<br>
<<a href="mailto:pascaldragon@googlemail.com" target="_blank">pascaldragon@googlemail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:pascaldragon@googlemail.com" target="_blank">pascaldragon@<u></u>googlemail.com</a>><br></span>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:pascaldragon@" target="_blank">pascaldragon@</a>__<a href="http://googlemail.com" target="_blank">googlem<u></u>ail.com</a><span><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:pascaldragon@googlemail.com" target="_blank">pascaldragon@<u></u>googlemail.com</a>>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Am 17.02.2015 16:29 schrieb "Bee" <<a href="mailto:bee.ography@gmail.com" target="_blank">bee.ography@gmail.com</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:bee.ography@gmail.com" target="_blank">bee.ography@gmail.com</a>><br></span>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:bee.ography@gmail.com" target="_blank">bee.ography@gmail.com</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:bee.ography@gmail.com" target="_blank">bee.ography@gmail.com</a>><u></u>>__>:<span><br>
><br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> Just got an article about new language features from<br>
RO's Oxygene<br>
language. I think some of them might be good to be<br>
(considered and)<br>
implemented in FPC v.3.<br>
><br></span>
> <a href="http://blogs.remobjects.com/__blogs/mh/2015/01/28/p7049" target="_blank">http://blogs.remobjects.com/__<u></u>blogs/mh/2015/01/28/p7049</a><div><div><br>
<<a href="http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2015/01/28/p7049" target="_blank">http://blogs.remobjects.com/<u></u>blogs/mh/2015/01/28/p7049</a>><br>
><br>
> What do you think? :)<br>
><br>
<br>
Some features are interesting and are on my own ToDo list (for<br>
example tuples). There will however be no roadmap for these<br>
features<br>
and more importantly they won't be part of 3.0, because<br>
that version<br>
is currently prepared for release and thus has a feature<br>
freeze.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Sven<br>
<br>
It would be nice if FPC adopt RC versions. So anyone could do<br>
tests just<br>
installing it via setup, instead of using GIT / SVN. And Lazarus RCs<br>
could be release using this RCs FPCs (e.g: Lazarus-1.4-RC1 has<br>
FPC-3.0.0-RC1).<br>
<br>
<br>
We /are/ doing RCs just like we've done in the past. Before 3.0.0<br>
will be released there will at least be a 3.0.0RC1 and maybe also a<br>
3.0.0RC2. But it takes time to prepare these and thus RCs are only<br>
prepared when a new release is planned. Everything else would be -<br>
simply spoken - a waste of our time that is better spent improving<br>
the compiler, the RTL and whatever else we have.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Sven<br>
<br>
<br>
The problem is that FPC take a lot of time to release new versions. If<br>
there was a version (RCs) every six months it would help a lot.<br>
<br>
Today I'm 32 years old, and probably I'll see the FPC 3.0 be released<br>
when I'm 33 years old. FPC 4.0 -> 40 years old. FPC 5.0 -> I will<br>
be already retired. =D<br>
</div></div></blockquote>
<br>
You shouldn't bother with version numbers too much. The next version could have as easily been 2.8 and the one after it 2.10. It's the features that count... And our normal rythm is a major release around every two years (currently a bit longer with 3.0, but nobody's perfect...)<span><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Just suggestions. I follow other programmer tools, and they don't take<br>
much time to release new versions, and some of them have fewer<br>
programmers that FPC community. =/<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span><div><div>
Regards,<br>
Sven</div></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>Yes, I know. I don't bother with numbers, I bother with the time between releases, that is very long.</div><div><br></div><div>The 'revival' of snapshot would be nice to solve the new releases needs.</div><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Silvio Clécio<br>My public projects - <a href="http://github.com/silvioprog" target="_blank">github.com/silvioprog</a></div>
</div></div>