<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 02.05.2013 13:25, schrieb Fred van
Stappen:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:BLU176-W476B82CBBCB2FA894072AB8BD0@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style>
<div dir="ltr">> that is the slowest system (by a big margin) I
have<br>
<div>> available.<br>
<br>
Im very interested by the result. <br>
But i continue to think there is something strange with
synchronize(). In my logic, synchronize(dummyproc) must have
NO effect on the parent thread. <br>
And it have.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
It seems that you didn't read what I wrote. Synchronize always
blocks until the given method was executed by the main thread. So
even if your method is empty there will be a delay until the
mainthread processes the synchronized method. And the more busy the
main thread is (e.g. updating the GUI) the more time it takes until
it can process a synchronized message. Also multiple Synchronize
events will be executed in multiple runs of CheckSynchronize runs,
because the "queue" in pre-2.7.1 can only hold one element. In 2.7.1
the queue can hold multiple methods enqueue by Synchronize and
Queue.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Sven<br>
</body>
</html>