<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 08/04/12 23:12, Jonas Maebe wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:D3622251-5ADD-4614-9B6A-35A2C492032D@elis.ugent.be"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
On 08 Apr 2012, at 21:56, patspiper wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The following is related to bug #0021680:
The idea is to let libraryB intercept calls to libraryA.
1- How can this be accomplished in Linux?
Using ordinals would have been a way, but Linux does use them.
Another venture (to be tested yet) may be dynamic loading of libraryA.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
That is indeed possible. You can LoadLibrary() the particular library you want (even if it has already been loaded implicitly by your program), and then look for the symbol using the handle for that particular library.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
I have just tested it successfully!<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D3622251-5ADD-4614-9B6A-35A2C492032D@elis.ugent.be"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2- Does this mechanism take place even when the function is imported under another name?
function functionB: char; stdcall;
external 'sharedlibrarya'
name 'functionA';
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
The mechanism operates at the level of the symbol name in the library. So if there are multiple symbols with the name 'functionA', then things will get mixed up. The Pascal name is irrelevant, except to the extent that it influences the symbol name if you do not explicitly
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">3- Should there be a warning about the name hiding?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
The compiler cannot warn about this because this is completely handled by the linker.
</pre>
</blockquote>
The compiler knows that functionA is there twice in sharedlibraryB:<br>
<br>
function functionB: char; stdcall;<br>
external 'sharedlibrarya'<br>
name '<b>functionA</b>';<br>
<br>
and<br>
<br>
function <b>functionA</b>: char; stdcall;<br>
begin<br>
Result := functionB;<br>
end;<br>
<br>
Since the linker behaviour is predictable under all platforms, can't
the compiler emit a warning?<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:D3622251-5ADD-4614-9B6A-35A2C492032D@elis.ugent.be"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">4- The link <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blogs.embarcadero.com/eboling/2010/02/16/5656">http://blogs.embarcadero.com/eboling/2010/02/16/5656</a> mentions: 'The linux support is a major PITA to implement'. Does that refer to implementing a non flat namespace linker model? In other words, difficult but not impossible?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
The compiler could always mangle the name, just like it does for units (of course, that would make it a major PITA to use such symbols from e.g. C code). But there is currently no support in the compiler to tell it to import an identifier from another library and to mangle it as if it were declared by Pascal code in a library/unit called 'module_something' (where it was originally declared by in other library).
</pre>
</blockquote>
That's too bad as Pascal should prevent you from shooting yourself
in the foot ;)<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Stephano<br>
</body>
</html>