<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
</head>
<body>
<p style="margin: 0;">
<span>
<span></span>
</span>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0px;"></p>
<div style="margin: 5px 0px 5px 0px;">
<br/>
"Ralf A. Quint" <FreeDOS@gmx.net> hat am 15. Oktober 2011 um 19:15 geschrieben:
<br/>
<br/>
> At 10:00 AM 10/15/2011, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
<br/>
>
<br/>
> >"Ralf A. Quint" <FreeDOS@gmx.net> hat am 15. Oktober 2011 um 05:03
<br/>
> >geschrieben: > At 03:56 PM 10/14/2011, Andrew Pennebaker
<br/>
> >wrote: > >Yeah, I know to chmod my scripts before dot-slashing them.
<br/>
> >It's just > >that fpc can't handle shebangs, and I don't want to
<br/>
> >have to choose > >either scripting or compiled. I like my Pascal
<br/>
> >code to be work in either mode.
<br/>
> >
<br/>
> >
<br/>
> >
<br/>
> >It's not enough to ignore the shebang line.
<br/>
> >
<br/>
> >You need some extra stuff/options/parameters to compile scripts and
<br/>
> >run them in various contexts.
<br/>
> >
<br/>
> >See instantfpc.
<br/>
> >
<br/>
> >
<br/>
> > > Gosh, (Free)Pascal is a compiler, not an interpreted script
<br/>
> > language > as you seem to be accustomed to!
<br/>
> >Mattias
<br/>
>
<br/>
> Kannst Du mir mal verraten warum Du hier meine Antwort qoutest aber
<br/>
> dann dem OP antwortest?
</div>
<div></div>
<div>Weil ich eigentlich noch was schreiben wollte, dann aber mein Neffe interveniert hat.</div>
<div>Einerseits hast du recht, andererseits spielt das fuer den shebang keine Rolle.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Mattias</div>
<div></div>
</body>
</html>