[fpc-pascal] Lack of 'volatile' a serious issue. Any other such caveats?
Lukasz Sokol
el.es.cr at gmail.com
Fri Dec 18 10:12:55 CET 2015
On 17/12/15 14:13, R. Diez wrote:
> Hi all:
>
[...]
>
> And there you go, I haven't quite started yet and I already
> discovered the first serious issue: there is no 'volatile' keyword.
> This matter has been brought up in the past, and it worries me that
> it has just been downplayed.
>
[...]
(semi-jokingly)
I know FreePascal is not Linux, the Team is not Torvalds etc ;)
but have you seen this ?
https://lwn.net/Articles/233482/
[...]
>
> Therefore, before I delve any deeper: are there any other serious
> drawbacks that I should know about before I invest more time looking
> at FreePascal?
>
(again, semi-jokingly)
It's Free and Open Software. You too can send a patch/suggestion ;)
> Regards, rdiez
el es
More information about the fpc-pascal
mailing list