[fpc-pascal] Re: linux: shouldwehard-codeversionedorunversioned shared libraries in our apps?

Marco van de Voort marcov at stack.nl
Thu Aug 16 14:29:15 CEST 2012

In our previous episode, Rainer Stratmann said:
> > And let's not forget: if we choose a reasonable default library name,
> > 99% of all problems fall away by themselves, and the component will
> > not be needed in the first place; Just for special cases will you need it.
> I did not follow the thread, but what about searching a 
> filename 'otherlibrarynames.txt' and if this file is existing then the 
> program looks into this file for other librarynames instead of the default 
> names.

If we would depend on customer configuration, we might as well have them
create a symlink.

More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list