[fpc-pascal] inline asm in fpc progran

Michael Van Canneyt michael at freepascal.org
Sat Aug 21 10:34:39 CEST 2010



All Jonas wanted to say was that you didn't report on his suggestions.
How can he help further if he doesn't know the result of his previous
suggestion ?

Giving help is in the first place diagnosing. We can't offer help if the
diagnose result is not known or incomplete.

Michael.

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:

> Jonas
>
> I was expecting exactly this response from you.
>
> I did'nt ask you to volunteer to help  me. If you don't find time, or feel
> it wasting your time, let somebody else do it. Issue is very much real and i
> tried out your suggestions without any use.
>
> regards
>
> Nataraj
>
>
> "Someday they gonna tell ya there was this clone of FreePascal,
> And it was called Delphi....
>
> Till then, we shan't be cocky and vain"
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be>wrote:
>
>>
>> On 20 Aug 2010, at 15:00, Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Jonas Maebe <jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You probably need the "nostackframe" directive, or remove the "mov pc,lr"
>>>>
>>>> at the end.
>>>>
>>>> Compile the code with -al, compile equivalent Pascal code with -al and
>>>> look
>>>> at the differences in the generated ".s" files.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I changed the kernel to old 2.6.30 and the code works on the Arm target!
>>>
>>> That kernel  has been compiled with CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y. Newer kernels
>>> dont
>>> show this option, only EABI.
>>>
>>> Also my ppcrossarm is :-
>>>
>>> Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/07/28] for arm
>>> Copyright (c) 1993-2009 by Florian Klaempfl
>>>
>>> What do you make of it?
>>>
>>
>> That you did not reply to the suggestions I made in my previous message.
>> Please say what you did and what happened, even if it didn't work. It's not
>> nice to spend time on trying to help someone, if that person then simply
>> ignores what you write and replies with something completely different.
>>
>> The EABI requires that the stack is always aligned to 8 bytes on entry/exit
>> of subroutines, and you probably mess up the alignment with the manually
>> inserted return instruction.
>>
>> Also, make sure that you compiled an EABI cross-compiler (ensure that
>> -dFPC_ARMEL is part of the OPT setting of the "make" invocation used to
>> compile FPC).
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonas
>> _______________________________________________
>> fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal at lists.freepascal.org
>> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>>
>



More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list