[fpc-pascal] Boolean expression short-circuit

Kornel Kisielewicz charon at magma-net.pl
Tue Nov 22 15:43:11 CET 2005


Ok, I've been arguing over that with a friend of mine for a couple of 
e-mail's now... I need your help!

Let me show an example first:

type TFoo = class end;
var  Foo : TFoo;

The question is, wether this is valid:

if (Foo <> nil) and (Foo.inheritsFrom(TFoo)) then do_something;

I would have no questions about that (first the Foo is checked, so 
inheritsFrom is called ONLY if Foo <> nil) if it weren't for the 
statement in the manual:

<quote>
Remark: The order in which expressions of the same precedence are 
evaluated is not guaranteed to be leftto-right. In general, no 
assumptions on which expression is evaluated first should be made in 
such a case. The compiler will decide which expression to evaluate first 
based on optimization rules.
</quote>

Can I make the assumption that boolean expressions are GUARANTEED to be 
evaluated left-to-right?

regards, and thank you,
-- 
At your service,
Kornel Kisielewicz [http://chaos.magma-net.pl/doom]
"Some thing's just cannot be programmed in a roguelike. For
everything else, there's GenRogue" -- Anubis



More information about the fpc-pascal mailing list