[fpc-other] Your thoughts on cloud based server instances?
José Mejuto
joshyfun at gmail.com
Thu Mar 16 00:21:26 CET 2017
El 15/03/2017 a las 19:12, Luca Olivetti escribió:
> El 15/03/17 a les 16:08, Santiago A. ha escrit:
>> El 13/03/2017 a las 17:33, Luca Olivetti escribió:
>>> So, while for a client ipv6 is enough, for a server ipv4 is mandatory.
>>> Glad I'm still on ipv4 ;-) (since I host my own mail server).
>>>
>>> Bye
>> Well, that is not accurate.
>
> Oh, but that's was only based on what José said, I originally posted
> this link https://cr.yp.to/djbdns/ipv6mess.html that in spite of being
> 14 years old it is still valid
>
>>
>> IPV6 can connect only to IPV6
>> IPV4 can connect only to IPV4
Hello,
In the conversation we were talking from the point of view of a
broadband client, or at least that's what I understood. So trying to be
clear from the point of view of the communications starter:
IPv6 can reach IPv6 and IPv4 as somewhere one double stacked router will
NAT it, as currently is "mandatory" for the migration.
Of course a server with IPv6 can be only reached with IPv6.
--
More information about the fpc-other
mailing list