<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Op 5/22/2019 om 9:06 AM schreef Sven
Barth via fpc-devel:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAFMUeB91kCs-s+kSHkH03RmqRaCf6pwZv6yHZgP6eucbZiGKzA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>In [target] you can specify "programs" but it's
also needed to specify scripts,
privileged_programs (sbin) and privileged_scripts.
Though the scripts targets could go in [install]
as well.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I get that these are concepts that don't map
1-to-1 outside of unix, but they would be useful
*for* unix systems.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If I do up a patch would there be an interest?</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">If you want to use it for yourself you might
better want to take a look at fpmake which uses Pascal code. </div>
<div dir="auto">fpcmake is only used by the compiler and RTL as
well as a skeleton for the fpmake packages nowadays. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Moreover the installer script install.sh (also) handled some of
differences in filesystem hierarchy on *nix. It was never "make
install" alone<br>
</body>
</html>