<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Am Fr., 15. Feb. 2019, 10:07 hat James via fpc-devel <<a href="mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org">fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org</a>> geschrieben:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>I'm interested in starting (or joining) a discussion on the next
(*non* backwards compatible) version of FPC. Instead of being
classically object oriented, there is merit in examining a model with
ad-hoc polymorphism like Rust.<br></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">A non backwards compatible version of FPC would not be FPC. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If you want to discuss singular extensions of the language (in a backwards compatible way that respects the spirit of the existing language) that can be done, but I highly doubt that a complete remodelling of the language just to satisfy the next hype language is in the interest of the other core devs (it definitely isn't in mine).</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Regards, </div><div dir="auto">Sven </div></div>