<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 02.03.2016 um 16:51 schrieb Maciej
Izak:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFTppY7-Av=G5Xx7fm8eJbq3r1u2BAT+MHfpwPNGks7YJzto9Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2016-03-02 16:40 GMT+01:00 Steve
Hildebrandt <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Steve.Kassel@web.de" target="_blank">Steve.Kassel@web.de</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">This solution would
leave one unable to aquire information about non manged
record fields.<br>
So in my opinion either adding seperate information for
non manged fields or a simple renaming(making it clear
what information to expect) are preferable.<span
class=""></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
separate information can be added later, together with other
rtti additions like attributes, detailed information about
fields like field name etc. (which make more sense with
mentioned rtti additions for unmanaged record fields rtti.
current information about unmanaged fields in "managed fields
array" is useless and confusing). Renaming in typinfo module,
IMO is bad idea, it breaks more compatibility.<br clear="all">
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
-- <br>
<div class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Best regards,<br>
Maciej Izak<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
While I can agree that the current way is confusing and renaming
might not be the best solution, the aditional Information is not
useless.<br>
I think it would be bad if changes reduce the amount of obtainable
information, <br>
since it leaves people unable to fix their programs if they are
reliant on, in this case rtti for unmanaged record fields.<br>
<br>
Steve.<br>
</body>
</html>