<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 11 Feb 2013, at 09:45, Sven Barth wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Monaco; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">On 10.02.2013 23:04, Marco van de Voort wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">I never spent more than an evening on the test though, since I rather get<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">rid of all the mingw parts instead (think fpmake here)<br></blockquote><br>This might be the best. Let's see that fpmake can handle all that and then get rid of the remaining tool dependencies.<br></span></blockquote></div><br><div>As I've said before: I think the compiler and RTL should remain Makefile-based (whether or not that is in addition to fpmake support for them, doesn't matter to me), to make porting to new platforms easier. "make cycle" is a very nice and easy test, and it would be quite annoying if fpmkunit and all of it dependencies would have to be compilable/working and installed before that could be performed. It would also make the bootstrapping process in general much more complex.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jonas</div></body></html>