<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 10 Feb 2013, at 21:07, Marco van de Voort wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Monaco; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">Note though that one of the reasons why FPC tools are old is because they<br>are the most up to date mingw versions. Before they abandonned the tools<br>we were using, and set up everything in MSYS.<br></span></blockquote></div><br><div>At least the mingw binutils are still maintained: <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/MinGW/Base/binutils/binutils-2.22">http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/MinGW/Base/binutils/binutils-2.22</a>. The same goes for "make" (FPC 2.6.x has problems with make 3.82 though, not specific to Windows/mingw) and gdb at least. Which abandoned tools do you mean?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jonas</div></body></html>