<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
</head><body style="">
<div>
<br/>Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl.fpc-devel@telemetry.co.uk> hat am 5. September 2012 um 11:38 geschrieben:
<br/>> Referring to http://www.freepascal.org/develop.var is there a reason why
<br/>> the "Fixes to 2.6.x" section gives a URI for fixes_2_2 ?
<br/>>
<br/>> What's correct in this context- branches/fixes_2_6/ or
<br/>> branches/fixes_2_6_0/ ?
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
fixes_2_6
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
See compiler/version.pas
</div>
<div>
<br/>
<br/>> I'm trying to find a 2.6.1 that will compile Lazarus 1.0. Yesterday's
<br/>> daily snapshot fails with
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Yesterday a feature was backported to fpc. I updated lazarus. Todays snapshot should work.
</div>
<div>
<br/>
<br/>> Compiling intfgraphics.pas
<br/>> intfgraphics.pas(634,49) Error: Identifier not found "TTiffIDF"
<br/>>
<br/>> Is there a specific revision number that is known to be OK for this? I'm
<br/>> trying to do notes for somebody off-list, and there's a code-generation
<br/>> patch in 2.6.1 that's needed for SPARC.
<br/>
<br/>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Mattias
</div>
<div>
</div>
</body></html>