<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
</head>
<body>
<p style="margin: 0;">
<span>
<span></span>
</span>
</p>
<p style="margin: 0px;"> </p>
<div style="margin: 5px 0px 5px 0px;">
<br/>
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <felipemonteiro.carvalho@gmail.com> hat am 14. September 2011 um 10:51 geschrieben:
<br/>
<br/>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Mattias Gaertner
<br/>
> <nc-gaertnma@netcologne.de> wrote:
<br/>
> > It's more than theory.
<br/>
> > You can use file names under Linux that are no valid UTF-8.
<br/>
> > At work I see it every week.
<br/>
>
<br/>
> In this case then for sure we cannot only have file routines only in
<br/>
> UTF-16, because that would make it impossible to identify many files
<br/>
> in Linux...
</div>
<p style="margin: 0px;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0px;">Well, "many" is a bit exaggerated. It does not happen on most Linux systems.</p>
<p style="margin: 0px;">And, yes, UTF-16 is not enough under Linux. </p>
<p style="margin: 0px;">But this is nothing new. This was explained several times on this list. See the many threads about unicode strings. </p>
<p style="margin: 0px;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0px;">Mattias</p>
<p style="margin: 0px;"> </p>
</body>
</html>