<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Em 10/05/2011 18:29, Joerg Schuelke escreveu:
<blockquote cite="mid:20110510232945.314f355f@xulinilux.local"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Am Tue, 10 May 2011 23:50:29 +0200
schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:DrDiettrich1@aol.com"><DrDiettrich1@aol.com></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The syntax would look like:
Block = "BEGIN" [Declarations] {Statement} "END" .
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Yea, it looks like C, but it is not. The difference in C like languages
is that an declaration is just a kind of statement. Without this, I
think it makes no sense. But then you code C-like with pascal keywords.
Jörg
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org">fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel">http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
I don't see any disadvantage writting a code with <i>C-like with
pascal keywords</i>, shortcuts are always welcome in order to code
faster (also this is the objective of the High-Level Languages,
isn't?). I like Pascal and I don't see why to resist against some
improvements, the language gets richer and easier. Some small
details can also increase the community.<br>
<br>
Lets see the OOP, its very helpful and speedup a lot the work and
has been added to the Pascal. Same for generics.<span
id="result_box" class="short_text" lang="en"><span title="Clique
para mostrar traduções alternativas" class="hps"><br>
</span></span>
</body>
</html>