<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 02 Jan 2011, at 17:41, Henry Vermaak wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Monaco; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">On 2 January 2011 15:26, Andrew Brunner <<a href="mailto:andrew.t.brunner@gmail.com">andrew.t.brunner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">I also want to assert that ideal engineering principals, no matter<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">who/where they come from must be seriously considered with extreme<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">diligence as the lack of such is, at its core, the main reason why it<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">has taken Linux so long to become widely adopted.<br></blockquote><br>What are these "ideal engineering principals"? Linux is the most<br>popular os for high performance computing by _far_ (and has been for<br>some time).<br></span></blockquote></div><br><div>Please move this discussion to the fpc-other list.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jonas</div><div>FPC mailing lists admin</div></body></html>