<div>Actually, Delphi now supports "for-in".</div>
<div> </div>
<div>It also supports things like nested classes, class helpers, operator overloading and inlining.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>See:</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/34324">http://dn.codegear.com/article/34324</a></div>
<div><br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 14/06/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Florian Klaempfl</b> <<a href="mailto:florian@freepascal.org">florian@freepascal.org</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:<br>> Hi,<br>><br>> I found this website containing language extension that Andreas
<br>> Hausladen wrote for Delphi.<br>><br>> Is there possibly something we can use in Free Pascal?  Sorry, I'm not<br>> sure what license Andreas used.<br>><br>> <a href="http://andy.jgknet.de/dlang/">
http://andy.jgknet.de/dlang/</a><br><br>I like the idea of making generics an extra section. Maybe we should<br>think about to do it the same way in fpc.<br><br>><br>> I like the "for-in" code.<br><br>Using the default property is clean, using count imo not. Thought I
<br>admit I've no idea so far to do it better.<br>_______________________________________________<br>fpc-devel maillist  -  <a href="mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org">fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel">
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel</a><br></blockquote></div><br>