[fpc-devel] confusion in FPC version numbers

Jonas Maebe jonas.maebe at elis.ugent.be
Tue Mar 27 09:51:23 CEST 2007


On 27 mrt 2007, at 09:44, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

> Why has the /Fixes_2_2 branch got a version number 2.1.3? The name is
> very misleading.  Why not 2.1.2 or 2.2.0?

Even version numbers are reserved for releases (either internal/ 
external releases), i.e. they correspond to a single source tree  
which is tagged. 2.1.2 has been tagged already for internal release  
building testing. 2.1.4 will be the first public beta for 2.2

> Or is 2.2.0 reserved for
> the day it actually gets released?

Yes.

> What is the version number of /trunk now?   2.2.1?   2.1.4?

2.3.1


Jonas



More information about the fpc-devel mailing list