[fpc-pascal] gcc beats fpc again

[Daniël Mantione]

Op Wed, 23 May 2007, schreef Bisma Jayadi:

> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=3Dall&lang=3Dall=
&xfullcpu=3D1&xmem=3D1&xloc=3D0&binarytrees=3D1&chameneos=3D1&message=3D1&f=
annkuch=3D1&fasta=3D1&knucleotide=3D1&mandelbrot=3D1&meteor=3D0&nbody=3D1&n=
sieve=3D1&nsievebits=3D1&partialsums=3D1&pidigits=3D1&recursive=3D1&regexdn=
a=3D0&revcomp=3D1&spectralnorm=3D1&hello=3D1&sumcol=3D1&calc=3DCalculate
> CPU and Memory weighted equally: FPC is the second. :-|
> =

> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=3Dall&lang=3Dall=
&xfullcpu=3D1&xmem=3D0&xloc=3D0&binarytrees=3D1&chameneos=3D1&message=3D1&f=
annkuch=3D1&fasta=3D1&knucleotide=3D1&mandelbrot=3D1&meteor=3D0&nbody=3D1&n=
sieve=3D1&nsievebits=3D1&partialsums=3D1&pidigits=3D1&recursive=3D1&regexdn=
a=3D0&revcomp=3D1&spectralnorm=3D1&hello=3D1&sumcol=3D1&calc=3DCalculate
> CPU only (mem weighted 0): FPC is the sixth! (below C++ and Eiffel) :(
> =

> http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=3Dall&lang=3Dall=
&xfullcpu=3D0&xmem=3D1&xloc=3D0&binarytrees=3D1&chameneos=3D1&message=3D1&f=
annkuch=3D1&fasta=3D1&knucleotide=3D1&mandelbrot=3D1&meteor=3D0&nbody=3D1&n=
sieve=3D1&nsievebits=3D1&partialsums=3D1&pidigits=3D1&recursive=3D1&regexdn=
a=3D0&revcomp=3D1&spectralnorm=3D1&hello=3D1&sumcol=3D1&calc=3DCalculate
> Memory only (CPU weighted 0): FPC is the first! :-D
> =

> Obviously, some C programmers has done some more optimizations. :(

No C programs have been submitted recently. It is probably the new =

broken scoring system.

Dani=EBl